TEACHING SCIENCE BY INQUIRY - REVIEW AND FEATURES OF PUBLISHED ARTICLES

Authors

  • Nedir Soares Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo - FEUSP
  • Sí­lvia Frateschi Trivelato Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo - USP

Keywords:

Teaching science by inquiry, Features of teaching science by inquiry, Conceptual, epistemic and social domain.

Abstract

In this report, we present the results of a survey conducted in different publications, in order to identify teaching science features based investigation currently in texts from analyzed work. The database consulted for location of such articles was the Web of Science. The search has located 53 articles from which fourteen approach science education research in their summaries. In this survey, we identified a wide range of features grouped in categories drawn up from the three areas presented by Duschl (2003). Such survey allowed to list features of teaching science by inqury and pointed questions to be deepened for the development of research.

Author Biographies

Nedir Soares, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo - FEUSP

Licenciado em Ciências Biológicas. Professor de Ciências e Biologia da Educação de Jovens e Aultos. Aluno do Programa de Mestrado em Educação da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo.

Sí­lvia Frateschi Trivelato, Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo - USP

Formada em Ciências Biológicas, Mestrado em Biologia, Doutorado em Didática.

Professora da Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo na área de Metodologia do Ensino. Orientadora nos programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação e Interunidades em Ensino de Ciências. 

References

ANDERSON, R. D. Inquiry as an organizing theme for science curricula. In: AKERSON, S.K; LEDERMAN, N. G. (Ed.). Handbook of research on science education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2007. cap. 27, p. 807–830.

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF SCIENCE (AAAS). Benchmarks for Science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.

BABACI-WILHITE, Z. A rights-based approach to science literacy using local languages: Contextualising inquiry-based learning in Africa. International Review of Education, Hamburgo, v. 63, n. 3, p. 381-401, Jun 2017. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-017-9644-3>. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

DEBOER, G. E. Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, New York, v. 37, n. 6, p. 582-601, Aug. 2000. Disponí­vel em: < http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1098-2736(200008)37:6%3C582::AID-TEA5%3E3.0.CO;2-L/pdf > Acesso em: 05 jan. 2018.

DURAN, M.; DOKME, I. The effect of the inquiry-based learning approach on student's critical-thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 12, p. 2887-2908, Dec. 2016. Disponí­vel em: < http://www.iserjournals.com/journals/eurasia/articles/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a>. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

DUSCHL, R. A. Assessment of inquiry. In: J. M. ATKIN; J. E. COFFEY (Ed.). Everyday assessment in the science classroom. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association Press, 2003. cap. 4, p. 41–59.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Science Education for Responsible Citizenship. Brussels: European Commission, 2015. Disponí­vel em: < http://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub_science_education/KI-NA-26-893-EN-N.pdf > Acesso em: 05 jan. 2018.

GOODRUM, D. ; RENNIE, L.J.; HACKLING, M.W. The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools: a research report. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, 2001.

HONG, J. C. et al. An Exploration of Students' Science Learning Interest Related to Their Cognitive Anxiety, Cognitive Load, Self-Confidence and Learning Progress Using Inquiry-Based Learning With an iPad. Research in Science Education, [S.L.], v. 47, n. 6, p. 1193-1212, Dec. 2017. Disponí­vel em: <https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y>. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

HSIAO, H. S. et al. A five-stage Prediction-observation-explanation inquiry-based learning model to improve students' learning performance in science courses. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, [S.L.], v. 13, n. 7, p. 3393-3416, Jul. 2017. Disponí­vel em: < http://www.ejmste.com/A-Five-Stage-Prediction-Observation-Explanation-Inquiry-Based-Learning-Model-to-Improve-Students-Learning-Performance-in-Science-Courses,70802,0,2.html >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

HSU, Y. S.; LAI, T. L.; HSU, W. H. A Design Model of Distributed Scaffolding for Inquiry-Based Learning. Research in Science Education, Netherlands, v. 45, n. 2, p. 241-273, Apr. 2015. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9421-2 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

KANG, J.; KEINONEN, T. The effect of inquiry-based learning experiences on adolescents' science-related career aspiration in the Finnish context. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 39, n. 12, p. 1669-1689, Jul. 2017. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1350790 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

LEVY, B. L. M. et al. Examining Studies of Inquiry-Based Learning in Three Fields of Education: Sparking Generative Conversation. Journal of Teacher Education, Washington, v. 64, n. 5, p. 387-408, Nov. 2013. Disponí­vel em: < http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022487113496430 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

LOFGREN, R. et al. Exploratory talk in science education: inquiry-based learning and communicative approach in primary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, [S.L.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 482-496, 2013. Disponí­vel em: < http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/files/pdf/vol12/482-496.Lofgren_JBSE_Vol.12-4.pdf >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

MANSOUR, N. Science Teachers' Views and Stereotypes of Religion, Scientists and Scientific Research: A call for scientist-science teacher partnerships to promote inquiry-based learning. International Journal of Science Education, London, v. 37, n. 11, p. 1767-1794, Jul. 2015. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1049575>. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

MARIAN, H.; JACKSON, C. Inquiry-based learning: a framework for assessing science in the early years. Early Child Development and Care, London, v. 187, n. 2, p. 221-232, Feb. 2017. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1237563 >. Acesso em: 28 dez. 2017.

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (NRC). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2012. Disponí­vel em: <http://www.nap.edu/catalog/13165/a-framework-for-k-12-science-educationpractices-crosscutting-concepts>. Acesso em: 04 jan. 2018.

_______. Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000. Disponí­vel em: <https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9596/inquiry-and-the-national-science-education-standards-a-guide-for >. Acesso em: 04 jan. 2018.

_______. National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996. Disponí­vel em: < https://www.nap.edu/catalog/4962/national-science-education-standards >. Acesso em: 05 jan. 2018.

PEDASTE, M. et al. Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, New York, v. 14, p. 47-61, Feb. 2015. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

RAMNARAIN, U. D. Teachers' perceptions of inquiry-based learning in urban, suburban, township and rural high schools: The context-specificity of science curriculum implementation in South Africa. Teaching and Teacher Education, New York, v. 38, p. 65-75, Feb. 2014. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.11.003 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

ROMERO-ARIZA, M. Inquiry-Based Learning: is there enough evidence of its benefits in science education? Revista Eureka Sobre Ensenanza Y Divulgacion De Las Ciencias, Espanha, v. 14, n. 2, p. 286-299, Apr. 2017. Disponí­vel em: < http://revistas.uca.es/index.php/eureka/article/view/3335/3088 >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

SEVER, D.; GUVEN, M. Effect of Inquiry-based Learning Approach on Student Resistance in a Science and Technology Course. Kuram Ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, Turkey, v. 14, n. 4, p. 1601-1605, 2014. Disponí­vel em: < https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1045037.pdf >. Acesso em: 27 dez. 2017.

TSENG, C.H.; TUAN, H.L.; CHIN, C.C. How to Help Teachers Develop Inquiry Teaching: Perspectives from experienced science teachers. Research in Science Education, [S.L.], v. 43, n. 2, p. 809-825, Apr 2013. Disponí­vel em: < https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9292-3 >. Acesso em: 05 jan. 2018.

ZION, M.; MENDELOVICI, R. Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, vol. 23, n. 4, p. 383-399, Dec. 2012. Disponí­vel em: < http://www.icaseonline.net/sei/december2012/p6.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 jan. 2017.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-03

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2019): SUPLEMENTO

Section

Artigo Teórico

License

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

  1. Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  2. Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não-exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capí­tulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
  3. Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).